Supernatural: Halt & Catch Pointless Heterosexuality

Become a Patron!

This past Tuesday Supernatural aired what was easily the weakest episode of season 10 so far in “Halt and Catch Fire.” As I observed on Tumblr during my live-blog, viewing this episode was rather like watching a bad, late-90s B-Horror movie…if iPhones were a thing in the late 90s. Anyway, my real beef with this episode is not its overall quality. I figure, when you write 22 episodes a season for 10 years, you are allowed a few duds along the way. My issue is rather the episode’s depiction of Dean’s hetero-sexuality, which was – to put it bluntly – gross and gratuitous even by Supernatural standards.

To give a bit of background, the episode takes place on a university campus, where a ghost is picking off a group of college kids one-by-one. (They killed him in a texting-and-driving accident, hence the vengeful spirit shtick). As Dean and Sam do their usual “suit and tie dance” around the campus, interviewing witnesses and people of interest, Dean is shown leering more than once in utterly gratuitous fashion at the college girls who populate the campuses public areas.

Dean Halt and Catch Fire 1 Dean Halt and Catch Fire 2

Dean Halt and Catch Fire 3

Although Dean has always been portrayed as something of a womanizer on the show, this episode’s depiction of it ushered in a whole new level of creepy, not to mention pointlessness. In canon, Dean is currently 36 years old. The women he was ogling were approximately 19. That’s an age difference of 17 years, meaning he easily could have fathered the girls he was overtly checking out in these scenes. Granted not all romantic or sexual dynamics between two people of significant age difference are inherently problematic, but these shots were, in my opinion, strongly reminiscent of the porn culture fetishization of “barely legal” girls by older men. (Especially since in the scene where this is most blatant, there is overt discussion about Dean’s age, and the fact that he is of a different generation than the college students with whom he’s interacting)

Supernatural has famously taken several giant missteps over the years in terms of how they depict women, and how they portray the heterosexuality of their main characters, especially Dean. (We all remember that horrid virginity-pledge episode where Dean unapologetically seduces a former porn star that had taken a vow of chastity. UBER creepy) But frankly this is the first time – to my recollection – they have depicted one of their leads leering at inappropriately young women who are barely above the legal line of consent.

Indeed, I found the whole thing so patently gross that initially, I believed it was being done on purpose to indicate something about Dean’s deteriorating mental/metaphysical state re: the Mark of Cain. I thought for sure, by the end, they were going to reveal that this was evidence he was slipping precipitously back into demon territory. Nope, apparently this is just regular old Dean being a mega-creep. Awesome.

Which leads me to the other aspect of this that I found not so much offensive as necessary to flag in the on-going civil war over Dean’s potential bisexuality. There are a lot of different rationales fans and viewers put forward in the argument that Dean should not be shown as canonically bisexual, one being that “the show is not about that” or that it would “distract from the story” or that it “serves no purpose.” Alright, well, for the moment let’s just skip over the fact that no one in the history of ever has argued that depictions of heterosexuality ought to be relegated only to shows that are “about” romance/sex. Or that canonical affirmation of a character’s heterosexuality “distracts” from the story. Or that a character’s heterosexuality “serves no purpose” so it should not be present in the narrative at all. Let’s just skip over the queer-phobic nature of demanding that same-sex eroticism constantly justify its own existence in media in a way heterosexuality NEVER EVER EVER is called upon to do. Let’s just by-pass that particular issue, for the moment.

Because as of “Halt and Catch Fire,” I really don’t give a flying fuck is Dean’s bisexuality is “pointless” or “gratuitous” or “doesn’t serve the story,” or is “distracting.” I don’t care. And do you know why I don’t care? Well, aside from the fact that representation of a marginalized societal group is never ‘pointless,’ the depiction of Dean’s hetero-sexuality in 10×13 was literally the most pointless, gratuitous, distracting, plot-irrelevant piece of BS I’ve ever seen. It served literally NO FUNCTION whatsoever in either the arc of the episode or the larger seasonal plot arc. It was by definition “pointless.” Yet somehow, it still managed to make it onto my TV screen in all its gratuitous, creepy, irrelevant glory.

So from now on, protestations of canonizing Dean’s bisexuality need to find a different line of reasoning other than it’s “pointless” or “not what the show’s about.” Because even if it were the case that him having same-sex attraction is ‘irrelevant’ to the story, at this point, putting it in there anyway would simply be an act of parity. If alternate-sex attraction can be depicted in Supernatural while serving absolutely no narrative function whatsoever (which clearly it can), so can same-sex attraction. That’s just fairness, pure and simple.

The truth is that while Supernatural’s depiction of Dean’s hetero-inclinations have often been varying degrees of sexist or excessive over the years, they usually have served some purpose, however flimsy or minimal, within the larger context of a particular episode or story arc. Dean’s sexual indulgence, and occasional abstinence, has often been utilized to communicate something about his broader mental or emotional state to the audience (“My Bloody Valentine,” “99 Problems,” “Reichenbach”), to generate humorous situations and banter with Sam (“Magnificent Seven,” “I Believe the Children are Our Future”), to facilitate homosocial male bonding (“Sex and Violence,” “Free to Be You and Me”) or as a plot-point that actually does service the larger narrative in some way (“The Slice Girls,” “Rock and a Hard Place,” “Girls, Girls, Girls”).

Problematic as many of these depictions are, none of them were unilaterally devoid of purpose. Displays of Dean’s heterosexual inclinations usually can be argued to have some function, however tangential or implicit, within the narrative. So granted, “Halt and Catch Fire” is an outlier in this regard; but the larger point still stands. Dean leering at those girls in that college library was both very creepy, and narratively u-s-e-l-e-s-s. It was the definition of gratuitous, distracting and pointless. It did nothing for the story, nothing whatsoever. Therefore, at this point, even if canonizing Dean’s queer inclinations did ultimately turn out to be ‘pointless’ to the narrative, I am compelled to beg the question SO WHAT?

By the way, if your response to that question is that depictions of queerness have a higher responsibility to be relevant to a plot than do depictions of heterosexuality, congratulations you are a homophobe, and you need to get your hypocritical ass off my fangirl lawn.

(For the record, this is not an argument about canonizing Destiel. While I do ship Dean and Castiel, and while I personally do think they should be canonized, my contentions in this essay are confined to Dean being made canonically bisexual by whatever means. And if your response is, “Why Dean?” my counter to that is this: go add up the number of queer jokes they’ve made about Dean over the years, stack that number up against the number they’ve made about every other nominally straight male character on that show over the years, and then have all the seats ever)

  1. Perhaps it’s my age but I saw something different in Dean’s leering in the last episode. Perhaps it’s because I see the brothers from an older sister, almost old enough to be mom perspective.
    While I agree on literally every other point you address, what I saw in the ogling of college students was a recognition that Dean is too old for that anymore. With each lingered and awkward stare, he seemed to be coming to grips with the fact that these young women are far out of bounds to him.
    Where at the beginning of the series, age wouldn”t have been an issue with college students, it most certainly is now. Also, at the beginning of the series, he lived life flying by the seat of his pants. He didn’t need to stop to consider the consequences because he he could get up and dust himself off. The Mark of Cain, a visible representitive of his inner demons, reminds him constantle, he can never just go back.
    As you observed, he’s reminded more than once, he is of a different generation. There is a certain loss of freedom in reaching middle age {I’m too Old For This Syndome} Rather similar to somone my age coming to grips with the realization she”s never going to get the ego boost of being carded for alcohol again…. and trust me, there is a certain grieving process in accepting one’s age.
    Still, the writeres need to be aware that it isn’t neccessary to hit the viewers over the head with heterosexuality. Society does that enough and the majority of SPN’s fan base won’t put up with something even covertly homophobic.
    There is still a lot of story to be told. knowing they have at least one more season to end on a well written note, I hope the writeres take great care in outlining their plans for next season. This stop and go is giving me motion sickness.

    1. But the writers kinda do, apparently. When you got people online writing essays about how Dean eating cake is subtext to him being bisexual, among other dumb bits of minutia, which leads to the writers being called homophobes and queerbaiters, they really kinda do need to beat the viewers over the head with this stuff sometimes.

      Also, how is Dean looking at women “covertly homophobic” I mean one of the writers of the episode is actually a gay man, which also hasn’t stop shippers hurling homophobe at him.

      1. Hitting people over the head with the fact that Dean is attracted to women does nothing to undermine the reading that he is bisexual because bisexual means attracted to men AND women. Showing his attraction to women does nothing to suggest he’s not bisexual. All it does is suggest he’s not gay. Bisexual and gay are not synonyms, and how attracted you are to one gender has no inherent relationship to how attracted you might simultaneously be to another gender. If the writers are doing this to try to ‘prove’ Dean’s not bisexual, then they simply have a fundamental misunderstanding as to what the word means.

        1. I would think that since he is only shown to have an attraction to women, and none to men, that it firmly places him in the heterosexual area. I don’t see how this rationale works, because he has only been seen shown to be interested in women, that leaves the door open that he is also attracted to men? If Dean only being shown attracted to women is indicative of the possibility of bisexuality, then the same could be said for Sam, Bobby, John, Jo, etc….

          1. In theory, yes, you are correct. Pretty much any character can potentially be bisexual. However, the reason people tend to pick out Dean is because, far in excess of any other ‘straight’ character on that show, Dean is regularly put in situations that read as overtly queer. Take a look:

            This is supercut of almost all of the scenes in Supernatural where someone implies Dean is queer, or when he’s hit on by other men, or when he himself makes a ‘no-homo’ joke. It’s 30 minutes long. Were you to make a video like this for Sam it would be at a generous estimate, probably about 5 minutes long. Also, when Sam is queerbaited it tends to be one-off lines that take up virtually no screen time and are not actually integral to the plot. When Dean is queerbaited, in addition to the many one-off lines, they devote entire long scenes to him being propositioned by a male Dom in an S&M dungeon, or flirting past a male security guard through a lesbian character or being asked out in a bar by another dude, not to mention constructing a whole episode around him having a male siren. 9 times out of 10 when one of the two main male characters are intimated to be queer, it’s Dean. Supernatural queerbaits almost all of its main characters somewhat, but no one else holds a candle to Dean in terms of sheer amount. That’s why people, myself included, argue the show has given him a strong bisexual subtext. Otherwise, why favor Dean so heavily for these types of lines, and scenes? Am I just supposed to believe its a gigantic coincidence?

        2. The majority of the things in that video that are regarded as queer baiting, are simply confirmation bias. I mean come on, it cites Dean being obsessed with Westerns as queer baiting. The siren thing — it’s explained three times in the episode that it’s not sexual in the least, I mean the siren is still a male when Sam gets infected I could go point by point for each instance and refute what the video is claiming, but that would take forever. Here’s one more for the hell of it, Dean telling Cas “blow me” not meant to be sexual, believe it or not that is something men will say to anyone out of anger.

          Though I will admit that some of the things in the video were simply jokes, and a lot of people see even making dumb jokes as queer baiting. But that still doesn’t mean they were anything other than jokes, otherwise the show has been teasing Sam/Dean to become canon forever.

          1. It’s also confirmation bias to say they aren’t queerbaiting. All of those moments DO have a queer implication. What an individual audience member chooses to do with that implication is always ultimately up to them. But it can only be argued to be confirmation bias on my part but not on your part IF we concede to the idea that heterosexuality is always inherently the default way to read characters. Which is the definition of heterosexism and heteronormativity. You defaulting all these moments to their ‘heterosexual’ explanation – oh it was just a joke, other people are reading ‘too much into it’, whatever – is also a bias, BY DEFINITION. And why does your bias automatically hold more weight than mine?

            But I still think you are missing the most crucial aspect of my previous comment’s argument. Which is why is it always DEAN who gets these kinds of scenes and lines, and moments? Why do they pick DEAN for these situations over and over and over and over again? Why was Dean the one chosen to have the male siren while Sam got the female decoy? Why was Dean the one chosen to flirt with the male security guard through Charlie, while Sam coached her with Harry Potter lore? Why was Dean the one chosen to be hit on by Aaron in the pub? Why is Dean constantly making ‘no-homo’ jokes while Sam literally never makes one throughout the entirety of the series? Why does Sam get Ruby in season 4, while Dean gets Castiel? Why does Sam get Amelia in season 8 while Dean gets Benny? Why is Sam the one who looks at the guys ARM tattoo in 5.07 while Dean checks out the birthmark on his groin? If they really are just meant to be ‘jokes,’ and this remarkably consistent pattern IS ultimately meaningless, wouldn’t they at least spread it out fairly evenly? Wouldn’t it be random as to which of the brothers gets the queer-but-not-really joke on any given day? Are they flipping a coin and it just comes up Dean nine times out of ten because…who knows?

            In all these fights I’ve been having with fellow fans about this over the years, not one person has yet been able to give me a satisfying answer to the why DEAN question. Why favor him so drastically? Why is he such a better target of ‘no-homo’ humor relative to his brother? Why does Supernatural treat him as the natural and default recipient of these types of jokes? WHY HIM?

  2. Thing is Dean isn’t bisexual, so the idea of canonizing it infers that it has been hinted at, when it has not. So him not being bisexual has nothing to do with being “pointless” or “not what the show is about” and is more about the fact that he is heterosexual. I mean that’s my rational, Eric Kripke says he’s hetero, Jensen Ackles says he’s hetero, I’m gonna go with he’s hetero.

    Of course on the flip side, if he was ogling male college students of the same age, everyone online would be squeeeing and writing metas on Tumblr. There appears to be a bit of hypocrisy to it, and has nothing to do with age and more to do with the sex of the people Dean was looking at. Hell, it extends to even women age appropriate, Dean checking out a waitress will get cries of “No homo”.

    Citing jokes where people think Dean and Sam are a couple (of which Sam quickly denies as much as Dean), there are what, 4 or 5 of them? And the Aaron Bass bit would make it either 5 or 6. That argument wouldn’t hold up anywhere but Tumblr.

    1. Your contention about Dean being heterosexual is a tautology and is therefore pointless to try to argue. However, for the record, my argument was designed solely to be an intervention into one specific line of reasoning some fans have put forward in protesting the possibility of canonizing Dean’s bisexuality. A lot of people have argued that the show shouldn’t do it because it’s “pointless” and I was merely pointing out the fact that if they can include depictions of heterosexuality that are pointless, then bisexuality should not be held to a ‘higher’ standard.

      One can still put forward OTHER rationales as to why he should not be canonized as bisexual. I was simply arguing that that one particular rationale – “it’s pointless” – demonstrably does not hold water if we are treating all depictions of sexuality equally.

  3. 🙁 things like this are honestly why i’ve backed out of watching supernatural for the most part, though i still happily engage with my corner of fandom. i’ve seen such an ante up with dean’s gross/violent behavior towards women starting with season nine, which a lot of fans tried to explain as “the mark” but it honestly started before the mark was even brought into the story… it’s sad that so many writers really think this is who dean is, for many reasons 🙁

    that said, this is a great article, as unfortunate as it is that this all had to be said 🙁 two other examples of dean perving on “barely legal” girls come to mind – it’s the great pumpking sam winchester in season four, as well as after school special in the same season. so sad. and he’s probably even older than 36 now if you factor in all the time jumps 🙁

    1. What gross/violent behavior did Dean engage in with woman in season 9? About the most violent he got was with Abaddon, which the whole point was that the MoC took him over in that instance.

      As for the Suzy thing, fandom seems to be split down the middle with that, some think it’s gross heternormantivity others think it was just consensual sex between two adults. I fall in the consensual side of things, while it may not have been the most slickly written scene, Suzy is still the one who initiates flirting with Dean and ultimately makes the choice to have sex with him. But that’s just my viewing.

Comments are closed.